Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#475 closed defect (fixed)
Segmentation fault while trying to backup Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.2 ISO images to external HDD
Reported by: | Salim Karam | Owned by: | Bruno Cornec |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 2.2.9.6 |
Component: | mondo | Version: | 2.2.9.5 |
Severity: | major | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Hello Mondo support,
I installed MondoRescue 2.2.9.5 on Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.2 (actually a slightly customized Red Hat distro), and I prepared a USB 1 TB external drive, and formatted it's main partition as ext3, and made sure that the system recognises it. The HDD in question is properly mounted as /media/Linux-HDD. The original device name is /dev/sdc1. After I select the Hard Disk option and I point to /media/Linux-HDD, I am able to enter most of the requested information. When I reach the "What to backup" dialog box, and I choose the default "/" to back it all, I don't reach the excluded directories box. MondoArchive gives me a segmentation fault error. The mondoarchive.log file finishes with the following:
============ running: mindi -V > /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.tmp 2> /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.err
Mindi v2.0.7.5-r2655
...ran just fine. :-) running: parted2fdisk -l | grep -i raid > /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.tmp 2> /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.err
...ran with res=256 Done. User has chosen not to backup the PC running: umount /mnt/cdrom > /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.tmp 2> /media/Linux-HDD/mondo.tmp.cDtShm/mondo-run-prog-thing.err
umount: /mnt/cdrom: not mounted
...ran with res=256 [Main] newt-specific.c->finish#422: Calling newtSuspend() ======================
The Linux system specs are: Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Carthage) Kernel 2.6.18-92.el5xen on an x86_64
Any help is appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Regards, Salim Karam
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | mondoarchive.log added |
---|
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
There is a known issue with the Curses interface with that version. It has been fixed in beta for next version. Could you try the packages available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/rhel/5/x86_64/ ?
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 13 years ago
Dear Bruno,
Thanks for the reply. Just in order for me to do it right:
1- Do I have to uninstall the older packages if I want to install the new ones?
2- Which packages do I need to install from the list below?
03/21/2011 02:01AM 267,732 mindi-2.0.7.7-0.20110320201031.rhel5.src.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 248,275 mindi-2.0.7.7-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 3,130,359 mindi-busybox-1.18.3-0.20110320201031.rhel5.src.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 280,577 mindi-busybox-1.18.3-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 3,537 mindi-busybox-debuginfo-1.18.3-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 80,110 mindi-debuginfo-2.0.7.7-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 2,460,958 mondo-2.2.9.6-0.20110320201031.rhel5.src.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 1,295,364 mondo-2.2.9.6-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:01AM 1,002,878 mondo-debuginfo-2.2.9.6-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
03/21/2011 02:10AM 138 mondorescue.repo
03/26/2011 12:59AM 30,043 pb.pubkey
03/26/2011 01:07AM 124 pb.repo
Thanks and regards, Salim
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Replying to sjkaram:
1- Do I have to uninstall the older packages if I want to install the new ones?
At least you have to update with rpm -U/-F
2- Which packages do I need to install from the list below?
03/21/2011 02:01AM 248,275 mindi-2.0.7.7-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Yes
03/21/2011 02:01AM 280,577 mindi-busybox-1.18.3-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Yes.
03/21/2011 02:01AM 1,295,364 mondo-2.2.9.6-0.20110320201031.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
Yes.
Or any newer version of the same packages.
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Dear Bruno,
The packages of Mondo 2.2.9.6 solved this issue, thank you very much.
Regards, Salim Karam
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Dear Mondo Support,
Any clue on this issue? I prefer not to use an offline cloning solution which is OS-independent (like Clonezilla), because I will have to do the backup operation during offline time, and in front of the console! I'd appreciate it if you can provide a working alternative, and I'll be ready to provide additionnal information if required.
Regards, Salim Karam