Changeset 3621 in MondoRescue for branches/3.3/mindi-busybox/testsuite/awk.tests

Timestamp:

Dec 20, 2016, 4:07:32 PM (7 years ago)

Author:

Bruno Cornec

Message:

New 3?3 banch for incorporation of latest busybox 1.25. Changing minor version to handle potential incompatibilities.

Location:

branches/3.3

Files:

• . (copied) (copied from branches/3.2 )
• mindi-busybox/testsuite/awk.tests (modified) (2 diffs)

branches/3.3/mindi-busybox/testsuite/awk.tests

@@ -25 +25 @@
 
 # 4294967295 = 0xffffffff
-testing "awk bitwise op"  "awk '{ print or(4294967295,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk bitwise op"  "awk '{ print or(4294967295,1) }'" "4294967295\n" "" "\n"
+
+# we were testing for a non-empty body when deciding if a function was
+# defined or not. The testcase below caused:
+# awk: cmd. line:8: Call to undefined function
+prg='
+function empty_fun(count) {
+  # empty
+}
+END {
+  i=1
+  print "L" i "\n"
+  empty_fun(i + i + ++i)
+  print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk handles empty function f(arg){}" \
+    "awk '$prg'" \
+    "L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
+    "" ""
+
+prg='
+function outer_fun() {
+  return 1
+}
+END {
+  i=1
+  print "L" i "\n"
+  i += outer_fun()
+  print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk properly handles function from other scope" \
+    "awk '$prg'" \
+    "L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
+    "" ""
+
+prg='
+END {
+  i=1
+  print "L" i "\n"
+  i + trigger_error_fun()
+  print "L" i "\n"
+}'
+testing "awk properly handles undefined function" \
+    "awk '$prg' 2>&1" \
+    "L1\n\nawk: cmd. line:5: Call to undefined function\n" \
+    "" ""
+
+
 optional DESKTOP
-testing "awk hex const 1" "awk '{ print or(0xffffffff,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
-testing "awk hex const 2" "awk '{ print or(0x80000000,1) }'" "2.14748e+09\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk hex const 1" "awk '{ print or(0xffffffff,1) }'" "4294967295\n" "" "\n"
+testing "awk hex const 2" "awk '{ print or(0x80000000,1) }'" "2147483649\n" "" "\n"
 testing "awk oct const"   "awk '{ print or(01234,1) }'"      "669\n"         "" "\n"
 SKIP=
@@ -223 +270 @@
     "a:b c:d\ne:f g:h"
 
+optional FEATURE_AWK_LIBM
+testing "awk large integer" \
+    "awk 'BEGIN{n=(2^31)-1; print n, int(n), n%1, ++n, int(n), n%1}'" \
+    "2147483647 2147483647 0 2147483648 2147483648 0\n" \
+    "" ""
+SKIP=
+
+testing "awk length(array)" \
+    "awk 'BEGIN{ A[1]=2; A[\"qwe\"]=\"asd\"; print length(A)}'" \
+    "2\n" \
+    "" ""
+
+testing "awk length()" \
+    "awk '{print length; print length(); print length(\"qwe\"); print length(99+9)}'" \
+    "3\n3\n3\n3\n" \
+    "" "qwe"
+
+testing "awk -f and ARGC" \
+    "awk -f - input" \
+    "re\n2\n" \
+    "do re mi\n" \
+    '{print $2; print ARGC;}' \
+
+optional FEATURE_AWK_GNU_EXTENSIONS
+testing "awk -e and ARGC" \
+    "awk -e '{print \$2; print ARGC;}' input" \
+    "re\n2\n" \
+    "do re mi\n" \
+    ""
+SKIP=
+
+# The examples are in fact not valid awk programs (break/continue
+# can only be used inside loops).
+# But we do accept them outside of loops.
+# We had a bug with misparsing "break ; else" sequence.
+# Test that *that* bug is fixed, using simplest possible scripts:
+testing "awk break" \
+    "awk -f - 2>&1; echo \$?" \
+    "0\n" \
+    "" \
+    'BEGIN { if (1) break; else a = 1 }'
+testing "awk continue" \
+    "awk -f - 2>&1; echo \$?" \
+    "0\n" \
+    "" \
+    'BEGIN { if (1) continue; else a = 1 }'
+
 # testing "description" "command" "result" "infile" "stdin"